Oklahoma City skyline at dusk

Civil-rights and serious-injury cases built around the evidence.

Hicks Law Firm represents people and families in cases involving government misconduct, deaths in custody, commercial-vehicle crashes, catastrophic injuries, wrongful death, and insurance bad faith.

Attorney advertising. Every case depends on its own facts and law. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

$126,000,000

Gaines v. City of Moore

A federal jury returned a $126 million verdict in this Oklahoma § 1983 action in April 2026.

$126,000,000Verified Civil-Rights Jury Verdict
Published Case ResultsReviewed Before Publication
Federal & State CourtsOklahoma Statewide Practice
D
D.B.March 2026

Jason will fight for you! He is experienced and won't back down. Whatever you're going through, don't go it alone! Call Hicks Law Firm today!

E
E.K.March 2026

Hicks Law Firm is trustworthy and reputable. Highly recommend

D
D.C.A.

Great lawyer! Genuinely cares about his clients and getting a great result.

L
L.B.May 2026

Highly recommend Hicks Law Firm. He pays close attention to detail and will fight for you.

T
T.E.May 2026

So I'm giving five stars I would give more if that was possible. Can't say enough about Jason. He is very knowledgeable and extremely experienced in his field as an injury attorney. I felt very well taken care of. Jason was just as invested in our lawsuit as we were. He was diligent about being on top of things, and to make sure that we received what we were entitled to, and that we received it as quickly as possible. I would recommend him 1000 times over for any of your injury cases or anything that you might have come up. Thank you, Jason for taking care of our family

J
J.H.May 2026

Great people and great service. Honest communication, knowledgeable team, and they truly go above and beyond for their clients. Would absolutely recommend.

Civil Rights and Serious Injury

Focused legal work for government misconduct, fatal loss, catastrophic injury, commercial crashes, and insurer misconduct.

Government accountability

Civil Rights

Police force, jail neglect, custody deaths, and constitutional claims that require federal civil-rights litigation experience.

Published results include federal civil-rights and in-custody-death jury verdicts.

View case details

Jail records & medical proof

In-Custody Death

Deaths in custody, denied medical care, missed checks, and failure-to-protect claims against detention facilities.

A review may involve jail video, logs, medical records, policies, and private medical-provider conduct.

View case details

ECM & ELD evidence

Truck Accidents

Semi-trucks, fleet vehicles, black-box data, and carrier records that may be lost under routine retention or repair practices.

A review may focus on ECM data, ELD records, dash video, maintenance files, and carrier safety records.

View case details

Families, not files

Wrongful Death

A review may address responsibility, estate structure, family losses, available records, and applicable deadlines.

These matters may require coordinated review of probate, medical, employment, and family-loss records.

View case details

Insurer conduct litigation

Bad Faith Insurance

Denied, delayed, or underpaid first-party claims that may require review of the policy, claim file, and insurer conduct.

A review can examine the claim file, coverage position, communications, and insurer conduct.

View case details

Body-cam & use-of-force

Police Misconduct

Police shootings, beatings, and other uses of force that may require review under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Relevant proof may include body-camera video, dispatch records, witness accounts, policies, and medical evidence.

View case details

A Clearer Case Review

Complex cases require an organized record, not a sales pitch.

1. Identify records that may not remain available.

Trucking ECM, telematics, jail surveillance, and body-cam footage can become harder to obtain over time. The available preservation steps depend on the facts and applicable law.

2. Build a record that can be evaluated and challenged.

Medical records, testimony, expert analysis, policies, and digital evidence can affect responsibility and damages. Each matter requires its own investigation and legal analysis.

3. Explain the next step in plain language.

Section 1983 claims, in-custody deaths, disputed insurance coverage, and catastrophic injuries can involve different defendants, deadlines, and proof. A review should identify what is known, what is missing, and what may happen next.

Verify the firm before sharing case details.

Representative results

Review published outcomes with the reminder that every case is different.

Review Results

Trust standards

See how public claims and credentials are reviewed before publication.

Open Trust Center

Attorney background

Review Jason Hicks's profile and the firm's stated practice focus.

View Attorney Profile

Request a Case Review

Tell us what happened and how to reach you.

The initial form is intentionally brief. An attorney can request additional records or details if the matter needs further review.

Helpful details

Share only what you know. Do not send confidential documents through the initial form.

  • When and where the event occurred.
  • Which agency, business, vehicle, or insurer was involved.
  • Whether there is an urgent deadline or an immediate need to preserve evidence.

Prefer to call? (405) 759-0515

Request a Case Review

Provide a short summary and the best way to contact you.

Start with the facts

A short summary of what happened and how to reach you is enough to begin.

Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send documents or other sensitive information until the firm asks for them.